With Halloween lurking around the corner and as National Cybersecurity Awareness Month comes to a close, the McGuireWoods Data Privacy & Cybersecurity Practice Group reminds you to not wait to be spooked by a cybersecurity incident or haunted by the task of maintaining your cybersecurity program.

Today’s threat landscape is rapidly changing and accelerated evermore by the capabilities of AI and automation on both sides of the cyber battlefield. Organizations that stay ahead are using established cybersecurity frameworks to provide a strong architecture on which to continuously evolve their cybersecurity program and testing their response to the latest threats through tabletop exercises. By leveraging modern technologies, such as AI-enabled detection, zero trust architectures, automated configuration management, and secure-by-design engineering, leading organizations are making cybersecurity not just stronger, but measurably faster, leaner, and more resilient.Continue Reading Halloween Reminder – Don’t Get Haunted by Hacks

California’s Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) is a 1967 criminal wiretapping statute being stretched to govern 2025-era internet technologies.  The result has been a patchwork of conflicting decisions that turn on hair-splitting distinctions about what it means to “read” a communication “in transit,” whether URLs and clickstream data constitute “contents,” and how third-party service providers fit within a statute that never contemplated real-time web analytics, session replay tools, or ad technology.Continue Reading California’s CIPA Jurisprudence Is Unworkable: The Legislature Should Fix It—Starting With SB 690

In a significant step toward strengthening consumer privacy protections, the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) board has officially adopted a comprehensive set of updates to the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) regulations.  These long-anticipated regulations—covering cybersecurity audits, risk assessments, and automated decision-making technology (ADMT)—mark a pivotal shift in the state’s data privacy enforcement landscape.Continue Reading New CCPA Rules Are Here: Is Your Business Ready for What’s Next?

Regulators of data privacy laws have expressed a desire in recent months to intensify enforcement around opt-out preference signals, also known as universal opt-out mechanisms (the “Opt-Out Signals”).

Opt-Out Signals allow consumers to automatically opt-out of the sale and sharing of personal information for targeted advertising across all websites they may visit through an internet

In 2020, California was the first mover in state comprehensive privacy law legislation, a distinction it held for approximately three years before other states took similar action.  Indeed, eighteen additional states have passed their own privacy bills, along with many complementary laws related to children’s privacy, consumer health data privacy, biometric data privacy, and data broker practices.  Notwithstanding these efforts, California has retained its reputation as the most formidable state enforcer of privacy law protections—until now, at least.  As we explain, recent enforcement actions by the Attorneys General of Connecticut and Nebraska highlight an important shift: states beyond California are not only enacting laws aimed at safeguarding privacy, they are taking action to demonstrate that those laws have teeth.Continue Reading State AGs Step Up Enforcement: Recent Lessons from Privacy Law Enforcement in Connecticut and Nebraska

Amazon’s recent announcement to invest at least $20 billion in cloud computing and AI data center campuses across Pennsylvania — a record‑breaking private investment in the state — marks a turning point in digital infrastructure build-out. Spanning sites in Luzerne and Bucks counties, the project promises 1,250 full‑time roles and thousands more in construction, while

On June 3, 2025, the California Senate unanimously voted to amend the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”) to exclude cookies and other commonly used internet tracking technologies from CIPA under certain circumstances.  The bill, Senate Bill 690, if passed by the other chamber and signed by the governor, will exempt companies who use tracking technologies for a “commercial business purpose” from the wiretapping provisions of CIPA.Continue Reading Emerging Defense in CIPA Lawsuits: Potent Yet Constrained by Legal and Technical Limitations

In a recent decision, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has construed the private right of action provision under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) broadly, which increases business risk to tracking technologies lawsuits that are already rampant.Continue Reading Broad Interpretation of CCPA’s Private Right of Action Increases Business Risk to Tracking Technologies Lawsuits

On March 7, 2025, the California Privacy Protection Agency (“CPPA”), which is tasked with enforcing the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) entered a Stipulated Final Order (“Order”) with American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (“Honda”), fining Honda $632,500.  This Order is instructive as to CPPA’s views on various topics covered by the CCPA.  Among other things, the Order makes clear that:Continue Reading Businesses Beware:  The California Privacy Protection Agency Is Taking a Strict View on CCPA Compliance and Seeking to Impose Maximum Fines for Non-Compliance

On January 10, 2025, in the waning days of the Biden Administration, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau issued a Request for Information Regarding the Collection, Use, and Monetization of Consumer Payment and Other Personal Financial Data. The Request signals the Bureau’s strong concern with the ways financial institutions, and particularly new financial tools like widespread use of mobile banking, collect and use sensitive consumer-financial data. The Request was motivated by the results from the data that the Bureau collected in developing its Personal Financial Data Rights Rule, finding that “actual business practices show significant deviation from longstanding consumer expectations when it comes to the collection, use, and monetization of data harvested from payment transactions.” Among the Bureau’s chief concerns was consumers’ general ignorance about financial data that Americans believe “is kept private just because it is sensitive.” On the contrary, the Bureau found that not only is consumers’ sensitive financial information monetized, but also that it is commingled with consumer attributes like geographic location, social-media habits, and even individual voices. Such advancements, the Bureau worries, could lead to “dynamic pricing algorithms” that show different pricing for different users, based on their harvested personal data.  Continue Reading CFPB Explores the Need for Greater Financial Privacy